This weeks readings and the material
covered in the lecture brings about the topic of media ecology.
The
first thing I associate media ecology with is this picture that was shown in
the lecture of a nuclear family in the 1950s or 1960s, all sitting around the
television harmoniously, watching a television program.
What is interesting to note is the
fact that if you compare this image to a modern day family watching television,
the scene is quite different. I can discuss my family watching television on a
typical night. We are more than likely multi-tasking as one of us is usually on
our phones on Facebook or texting, or someone’s on the iPad or mum or dad are
on the telephone. We can hardly ever agree on something we all want to watch
due to the large number of media flows that are presented to us through pay tv
networks.
Just comparing these two scenarios
depicts how media ecology has transformed due to the new technologies in the
media available to us. Matthew Fuller (2005) describes media ecology as a
euphemism for the allocation of informational roles in organizations and in
computer-supported collaborative work. In other words, it describes how
information flows are used to sustain what we now call a relatively stable
notion of human culture.
Stuart Hall’s writings on Encoding and
Decoding also link to the notion of media ecology and how modern day machinic and
digital aesthetics have assisted in its development. Hall’s work is linked to fact
that media ecologies can be broken down into separate parts of a process, and
at each point undergoing treatment and filtering by specialization of
interests.
It is interesting to note that due to these new
technologies and new era of media and the way in which we use it, media ecology
looks into the matter of how media of communication affects human perception,
understand and feeling and how this interaction with media affects our lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment